Newsgroups: alt.politics.ec,sci.lang,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.esperanto
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.indirect.com!bud.indirect.com!stevemac
From: stevemac@bud.indirect.com (Stefano MacGregor)
Subject: Esperanto? The EU?
Message-ID: <D4Kp9t.DvE@indirect.com>
Sender: usenet@indirect.com (Internet Direct Admin)
X-Konvencioj: c` ... u` 
Organization: Homa Raso
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 1995 20:37:05 GMT
Lines: 22

Lastatempe skribis livesey@solntze.engr.sgi.com (Jon Livesey) jene:

>Although I am naturally flattered that my deathless prose is worth
>translating into Esperanto, I confess I fail quite to see what the
>response has to do with the dicussion.  Perhaps Mr MacGregor can 
>enlighten me. 

  en-->eo  Kiel la vortoj de s-ro MacGregor apartenas al la diskuto?

  I was responding to the part where     Mi respondis al la parto, en kiu
you claimed that, in effect, if the    vi postulis ke (efike) se estus tre
number of speakers of Esperanto were   multaj parolantoj de Esperanto, ili
very large, they would forget its      forgesus g`ian rolo kiel peranto,
mediator role, and all speak it as a   kaj parolus g`in kiel unuranga
primary language.  If you didn't mean  lingvo.  Se vi ne tiel intencis,
this, then there's nothing to worry    oni ne turmentig`u.
about.

-- 
 --        __0       Stefano MAC:GREGOR    Cin amis Dio tiom, ke Li mortus
  --     -`\<,      (s-ro)   \ma-GREG-r\     prefere ol vivi sen ci;
   --   (*)/ (*)   Fenikso, Arizono, Usono      jen do Li faris -- Joe Hall
