Newsgroups: sci.image.processing
From: Steve@dstrip.demon.co.uk (Steve Rencontre)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!news.bluesky.net!udel!gatech!swrinde!pipex!peernews.demon.co.uk!dstrip.demon.co.uk!Steve
Subject: Re: question,digital image transfer media/standards
References: <3h0l26$5al@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>
Distribution: world
Organization: Datastrip Limited
Reply-To: Steve@dstrip.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.6
Lines:  19
X-Posting-Host: dstrip.demon.co.uk
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 1995 16:10:33 +0000
Message-ID: <221824479wnr@dstrip.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

In article: <3h0l26$5al@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>  rkarp@ix.netcom.com (rein karp) writes:
> 
> Is there any kind of "standard" developing as to how to store and transfer
> digital image information to a printer/service?

I'd also be interested in this on behalf of a friend of mine with 
exactly the same question. He's currently using 42/84MB Syquest 
cartridges, but this is sometimes too small. The situation is only 
likely to get worse as his business expands and he takes on more 
complex work, so he was asking my advice. I recommend DAT wholeheartedly,
but I'm not in the printing business, so my advice is worthless 
if the industry is standardising on something else!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Rencontre               |  steve@dstrip.demon.co.uk (business) 
If it works, it's obsolete.   |  steveren@cix.compulink.co.uk (private)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

