Newsgroups: comp.speech
Path: lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!doc.ic.ac.uk!agate!ames!hookup!swrinde!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!zip.eecs.umich.edu!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!olivea!news.hal.COM!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!jathomas
From: jathomas@netcom.com (John A. Thomas)
Subject: Re: CVSD speech encoders
Message-ID: <jathomasCuAF3F.47x@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <jathomasCu8y02.JAn@netcom.com> <1994Aug9.163907.2157@wdl.loral.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 1994 21:45:15 GMT
Lines: 17

David Koontz (koontzd@io.lrmsc.loral.com) wrote:

: While 9600 baud CVSD is no where near telephone quality (unless you
: are talking GTE), a few manufacturers have duplex CVSD chips with
: integrated filters.

Thanks for the information about the MX-COM chip.  Military digital radio 
quality may be good enough.  I'll have to try and see.  Apparently the 
Motorola docs are a bit optimistic, as others have written to inform me 
that 9600 bps voice is not ready for prime time.

John A. Thomas
jathomas@netcom.com




