Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.pascal.borland,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.cobol,comp.lang.c++.leda,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.basic.visual.3rdparty,alt.computer.workshop.live,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.clearing.technology,alt.chinese.computing,news.newusers.questions
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!ralmon
From: ralmon@netcom.com (Ray R. Howard)
Subject: Re: PROGRAMERS OF ANY LANGUAGE
Message-ID: <K0rZxo+dEQAO088yn@netcom.com>
Sender: ralmon@netcom3.netcom.com
Reply-To: ralmon@netcom.com
Organization: Reality's Edge
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960329010021.13209A-100000@harvey>
 <4k4pl2$pea@host1.einstein.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 18:50:50 GMT
Lines: 31
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.smalltalk:36924 comp.lang.perl.misc:26272 comp.lang.pascal.borland:14729 comp.lang.eiffel:13625 comp.lang.cobol:9098 comp.lang.c++.leda:805 comp.lang.c:182877 comp.lang.basic.visual.3rdparty:12314 news.newusers.questions:208698

In article <4k4pl2$pea@host1.einstein.com.ar>,
jkohen@einstein.com.ar (Javier Kohen) wrote:
>
> ...
>I really like C/C++ because you can write almost any code, even
>nonsense code.
>
>I don't like Pascal, it's to easy, the compiler always knows the
>errors, you can't make a buggy program because you can't do a good
>program.
>What's the then after the if, or the do after the while/for for?
>Why i can't use...
>	for i := 1 to 10 step 2 (do)
>... or something like it?
>Why use begin/end instead of {/} ?
>
>Asssembler gets the $1000000 prize. You can do almost anything, YOU
>CAN DO ANYTHING!!!
>
> ...
>
>Javier Kohen,
>jkohen@einstein.com.ar
>

	Wonderful sarcasm! ROFL...

--
 ________________________________________________________________
| "Even a fool is thought wise if he keeps silent,  (Prov 17:28)
|   and discerning if he holds his tongue."    ralmon@netcom.com
