Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.misc
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!mdisea!mothost!schbbs!news
From: shang@corp.mot.com (David L. Shang)
Subject: Re: Types, types: static vs. dynamic -- classification
Reply-To: shang@corp.mot.com
Organization: MOTOROLA 
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 15:14:22 GMT
Message-ID: <1995Nov20.151422.6061@schbbs.mot.com>
References: <48imkb$5c9@news1.delphi.com>
Sender: news@schbbs.mot.com (SCHBBS News Account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 129.188.128.126
Lines: 13
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.object:40996 comp.lang.smalltalk:30842 comp.lang.c++:160975 comp.lang.misc:23913

In article <48imkb$5c9@news1.delphi.com> jsutherland@BIX.com (Jeff Sutherland)  
writes:

> David L. Shang wrote:
> > Smalltalk DOES NOT have types.  If one wishes to call classes types, things
> > will become confusing.  If one wishes to define a new thing in Smalltalk,
> > and call that thing, a 'type', great.  But first define what a type is.


Please be careful when you cite other's words. I did not write the
above. I have an opposite opinon -- SmallTalk HAS types.

David Shang
