Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news4.ner.bbnplanet.net!news3.near.net!paperboy.wellfleet.com!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!simtel!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!aggedor.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!cs.mu.OZ.AU!fjh
From: fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson)
Subject: Re: Why is one OO language more productive than another?
Message-ID: <9524602.2157@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
References: <40t027$7j9@hardcopy.ny.jpmorgan.com> <40t7veINNe25@bhars12c.bnr.co.uk> <40tcq2$10fa@tigger.cc.uic.edu> <40vashINNgo8@bhars12c.bnr.co.uk> <9523600.18871@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <26jg07$031@zoe.pcix.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 1995 16:29:20 GMT
Lines: 83
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.object:38004 comp.lang.eiffel:10749 comp.lang.c++:147738 comp.lang.smalltalk:28031
