Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.clos
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!oitnews.harvard.edu!purdue!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mel.aone.net.au!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!cs.mu.OZ.AU!munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU!fjh
From: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson)
Subject: Re: Why is one OO language more productive than another?
Message-ID: <9524404.29577@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU (CS-Usenet)
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
References: <40tcq2$10fa@tigger.cc.uic.edu> <41279tINNk9t@bhars12c.bnr.co.uk> <412spj$87s@tigger.cc.uic.edu> <41a52cINNqa7@bhars12c.bnr.co.uk> <DDo1zC.4sI@midway.uchicago.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 18:07:08 GMT
Lines: 17
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.object:37871 comp.lang.eiffel:10728 comp.lang.c++:147317 comp.lang.smalltalk:27933 comp.lang.clos:3466
