Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!altinbay
From: altinbay@netcom.com (John Altinbay)
Subject: Re: Multiple Inheritance--how can it be modeled?
Message-ID: <altinbayDBEqCr.H6z@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
References: <3tcmef$795@news.inlink.com> <3tjnpc$7mj@atglab10.atglab.bls.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 1995 17:10:03 GMT
Lines: 17
Sender: altinbay@netcom18.netcom.com

In article <3tjnpc$7mj@atglab10.atglab.bls.com> Faisal Waris <faisal.waris@bridge.bellsouth.com> writes:
>
>The need for multiple inheritence is quite apparent when modeling
>business objects. However unwanted side effects of multiple
>inheritence is possibly a reason that it has not been implemented in 
>Smalltalk.
>

I was likely unclear on which point I was commenting in my previous post.
I was questioning the first sentence - "The need for MI is quite apparent"


-- 
John Altinbay   -   altinbay@netcom.com   anon-1014@twwells.com
===============================================================
There's a spirit that guides me, a light that shines for me
My life is worth the living, I don't need to see the end.
