Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.object
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!mole-end!mat
From: mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us
Subject: Re: C++ Productivity
Message-ID: <1995Feb11.184448.10559@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>
Summary: To the fellow who sent me a reply on this ...
Organization: :
References: <1995Jan23.193745.7044@boole.com> <jim.fleming.84.00133AB6@bytes.com> <1995Feb4.210947.718@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 1995 18:44:48 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.c++:112334 comp.lang.smalltalk:20745 comp.object:26607

Sorry to bother y'all, but if you'd allow me to page someone ...:

Someone sent me a reply quoting the following text, and I would really
like to exchange mail with him (her?) but hes/hir mailer did not include
hes/hir user name, only some machine names.

  In article <1995Feb4.210947.718@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>, mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us writes:

  > The question is not `which language will replace C++?' but `what
  > preprocessing will people invent to make writing templates less clumsy?'

I'd be grateful if that person would send me an address at which they
can receive email.

Thank you all for your indulgence.
-- 
 (This man's opinions are his own.)
 From mole-end				Mark Terribile
 mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ
	(Training and consulting in C, C++, UNIX, etc.)
