Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!ames!taligent!paul-pelton.taligent.com!paul_pelton
From: Paul Pelton <paul_pelton@taligent.com>
Subject: Re: C++ / Smalltalk
Message-ID: <D0twzp.F46@taligent.com>
X-Xxmessage-Id: <AB14E040E4010C28@paul-pelton.taligent.com>
X-Xxdate: Wed, 14 Dec 94 01:47:44 GMT
Sender: usenet@taligent.com (More Bytes Than You Can Read)
Organization: Taligent, Inc.
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d17
References: <Pine.3.89.9412071806.E21912-0100000@mercury.interpath.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 01:47:49 GMT
Lines: 8

In article <Pine.3.89.9412071806.E21912-0100000@mercury.interpath.net>
Smalltalker, rayhorn@mercury.interpath.net writes:
>Smalltalk is completely object oriented whereas C++ is only said to be 
>(for marketing reasons... these days objects sell)

I realize this is a Smalltalk newsgroup, and I love Smalltalk, but can
you qualify this statement somehow? A blanket statement like this is
misleading and does not answer the original question.
