Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!cc.ic.ac.uk!ic.ac.uk!zarasj
From: zarasj@ic.ac.uk (Dr S.J. Zara)
Subject: Re: Smalltalk for Windows.
Message-ID: <1994Nov15.144142.18176@cc.ic.ac.uk>
Nntp-Posting-Host: chcgk.ch
Organization: Imperial College
References: <CywHA1.Cr6@da_vinci.ecte.uswc.uswest.com> <patrick_d_logan.191.0013FD49@ccm.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 94 14:41:41 GMT
Lines: 11

In article <patrick_d_logan.191.0013FD49@ccm.jf.intel.com> patrick_d_logan@ccm.jf.intel.com (Patrick D. Logan) writes:

>
>Neither one supports OLE directly at a class level. I do not know how much OLE 
>support one could do just using the Smalltalks' C calling capability. That's 
>more work than I want (or have) to do at this time!
>
In principle you should be able to support OLE completely - Smalltalk has
full DLL call support, and as that is the way OLE functions are provided...

Steve Zara
