Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.tamu.edu!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!bcarh8ac.bnr.ca!bcarh189.bnr.ca!nott!cunews!dbuck
From: dbuck@superior.carleton.ca (Dave Buck)
Subject: Re: Future of 16-bit and 32-bit Smalltak/V's?
Message-ID: <CwJvHM.Avq@cunews.carleton.ca>
Sender: news@cunews.carleton.ca (News Administrator)
Organization: Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
References: <m0qnpV9-000BqGC@nextsrv1.andi.org> <Pine.3.89.9409221227.E14358-0100000@mercury.interpath.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 21:24:58 GMT
Lines: 20

In article <Pine.3.89.9409221227.E14358-0100000@mercury.interpath.net>,
Smalltalker <rayhorn@mercury.interpath.net> wrote:
>Have you thought of using Envy/Developer? Envy/Developer is shipped with 
>a product called the Envy/Packager. The Envy/Packager can perform some 
>analysis of your application and then, with some tuning, produce very 
>small executables for Smalltalk/V. The Envy/Packager can greatly reduce 
>the run-time Smalltalk/V foot-print of your application and break the 8 
>MB barrier by allowing you to define which classes/methods will be 
>included in your run-time executable(s).

But Envy/Packager doesn't run with V/Win32.

David Buck
dbuck@ccs.carleton.ca

_________________________________
| David K. Buck                 |
| dbuck@ccs.carleton.ca         |
| The Object People             |
|_______________________________|
