Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!blackbush.xlink.net!news.ecrc.de!ecrc!lyra!micha
From: micha@ecrc.de (Micha Meier)
Subject: Re: Parallelism (Was Re: Is Visual Prolog
Message-ID: <DrEHE8.LKs@ecrc.de>
Sender: news@ecrc.de
Reply-To: micha@ecrc.de
Organization: European Computer-Industry Research Centre
References: <3md9487bqe.fsf@arnold.csd.uu.se>
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 14:54:07 GMT
Lines: 21

In article fsf@arnold.csd.uu.se, thomasl@csd.uu.se (Thomas Lindgren) writes:
>
>In article <DrC5Ku.75C@ecrc.de> micha@ecrc.de (Micha Meier) writes:
..
>   possible to search it in parallel without any extra cost.  See also
>   the APPLAUSE project
>   http://www.ecrc.de/research/collaborations/applause/applause.html
>
>Actually, I also wrote:
>
>>(There's been interesting work at ECRC on parallel
>>constraint solving in medicine, but I'm not enough into constraints to
>>tell you more.)

Actually, the point I was trying to make was that this was not only one application
in medicine, but a bunch of applications from other domains as well. Your sentence
suggested that this was a very specialised usage of parallel constraints
(or that the other domains were not interesting :-)), which I think was not
the case.

--Micha
