Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!news
From: Alexey Goldin <goldin@spot.uchicago.edu>
Subject: Re: Which one, Lisp or Scheme?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.uchicago.edu
Message-ID: <m1ybdfg9v6.fsf@spot.uchicago.edu>
Lines: 9
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (News Administrator)
Organization: University of Chicago
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
References: <slrn5e5geh.dl.yunho@csl.snu.ac.kr> <5c0th8$iqd@nntp.hut.fi>
	<3062798163303133@naggum.no> <1997Jan23.150438.27424@wavehh.hanse.de>
	<3063102967705823@naggum.no> <1997Jan26.191946.24040@wavehh.hanse.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 01:55:25 GMT
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.lisp:24864 comp.lang.scheme:18159

cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (Martin Cracauer) writes:
> 
> Comfortable CLOS browsing is another issue when talking about free
> alternatives, though. 
> 


OOBR (object oriented browser) for Emacs/Xemacs helps a lot. It comes
with Xemacs distribution, but works with Emacs too.
