Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.functional
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!NewsWatcher!user
From: hbaker@netcom.com (Henry Baker)
Subject: Current status of parallelism vs. continuations??
Message-ID: <hbaker-1006951127450001@192.0.2.1>
Sender: hbaker@netcom16.netcom.com
Organization: nil
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 1995 19:27:45 GMT
Lines: 15
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.lisp:18092 comp.lang.scheme:12879 comp.lang.functional:6020

I have read a number of papers on the troubled coexistence of continuations
with parallelism -- e.g., LFP'90, etc. -- and I was wondering what the
current status of this controversy is.  Has a "clean" model been developed,
or is this still in flux?

Please respond directly to me (in addition to the newsgroup, if you like)
so that I don't have to scan all of these groups for any replies.

Thanks in advance for any insights.

Henry Baker, hbaker@netcom.com

-- 
www/ftp directory:
ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/hb/hbaker/home.html
