Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!hookup!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!NewsWatcher!user
From: hbaker@netcom.com (Henry Baker)
Subject: Re: case for Lisp
Message-ID: <hbaker-0602951608220001@192.0.2.1>
Sender: hbaker@netcom.com (Henry G. Baker)
Organization: nil
References: <3h2n14$164@necco.harvard.edu> <D3L4JB.G0A@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 1995 00:05:49 GMT
Lines: 9

In article <D3L4JB.G0A@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) wrote:

> BUT these compilers don't emit C that you'd want to maintain as C.
> There are some things billed as Lisp-to-C "translators" that must
> do better, but since I've never seen their output I can't say whether
> it's good enough.

check out ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/hb/hbaker/CheneyMTA.html (also .ps.Z) and
ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/hb/hbaker/cboyer13.c
