Newsgroups: alt.lang.design,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.lisp
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!news.unige.ch!NewsWatcher!user
From: borbor@divsun.unige.ch (Boris Borcic)
Subject: Re: Comparing productivity: LisP against C++ (was Re: Reference Counting)
Message-ID: <borbor-1001951219400001@129.194.82.105>
Sender: usenet@news.unige.ch
Organization: University of Geneva
References: <19941203T221402Z.enag@naggum.no> <BUFF.94Dec15103904@pravda.world> <D0xAIp.3Dn@rheged.dircon.co.uk> <vrotneyD11MDv.Ks7@ <19941230.024415.758433.NETNEWS@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 11:19:39 GMT
Lines: 19
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.c++:106675 comp.lang.lisp:16324

In article <19941230.024415.758433.NETNEWS@UICVM.UIC.EDU>, dhanley@picasso
(David Hanley) wrote:

> "There are trivial truths & there are great truths. The opposite of a
> trivial truth is plainly false."
> "The opposite of a great truth is also true."
> 
> -Neils Bohr

Is it legit to self-apply ?
Then we get :

"The opposite of a deep falsehood is also a falsehood"

I suppose ?

- Boris Borcic
=
On nait tous les metres du meme monde
