Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!dircon!rheged!simon
From: simon@rheged.dircon.co.uk (Simon Brooke)
Subject: Re: Common Lisp's dual name space
Message-ID: <Cz85MH.5oI@rheged.dircon.co.uk>
Organization: none. Disorganization: total.
References: <39q02q$sib@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <aldersonCz0wnD.Frx@netcom.com> <Cz4MxK.4AM@rheged.dircon.co.uk> <3a47mf$n09@tools.near.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 1994 21:13:27 GMT
Lines: 21

In article <3a47mf$n09@tools.near.net>,
Barry Margolin <barmar@nic.near.net> wrote:
>In article <Cz4MxK.4AM@rheged.dircon.co.uk> simon@rheged.dircon.co.uk (Simon Brooke) writes:
>>In my view, there are no verbs in LisP. 
>
>Not even I/O and assignment functions and special operators?
>-- 

Hhmmm... pretty hard to make a case for assignment being anything
other than a verb. OK, my argument collapses as usual.

Cheers

Simon


-- 
--------simon@rheged.dircon.co.uk

	to err is human, to lisp divine
				 ;; attributed to Kim Philby, oddly enough.
