Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: cyber_surfer@wildcard.demon.co.uk (Cyber Surfer)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!sundog.tiac.net!news.sprintlink.net!demon!wildcard.demon.co.uk!cyber_surfer
Subject: Re: Lisp advocacy (Was Re: another take on "C is faster than lisp")
References: <STEVE.94Aug30141513@baloo.gsfc.nasa.gov> <778584011snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk> <778955109snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk> <34n5or$iou@news.kth.se>
Organization: The Wildcard Killer Butterfly Breeding Ground
Reply-To: cyber_surfer@wildcard.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.27
Lines: 15
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 1994 12:40:40 +0000
Message-ID: <779114440snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

In article <34n5or$iou@news.kth.se>
           d88-pjo@black01.nada.kth.se "Patric Jonsson" writes:

> >Am I the only one? 
> 
> No!
> 
> But why restrict it to Lisp?  I propose a Comp.lang.x-vs-y group.

That sounds even better! Of course, we could have a whole bunch of
comp.lang.*.advocacy newsgroups.
-- 
Future generations are relying on us
It's a world we've made - Incubus	
We're living on a knife edge, looking for the ground -- Hawkwind
