Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!uknet!festival!edcogsci!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Subject: Re: The fastest CL?
Message-ID: <CvI9s4.I4r@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (C News Software)
Nntp-Posting-Host: bute.aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
References: <MARCOXA.94Aug30095124@mosaic.nyu.edu> <CvEHFx.HEy@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu> <RAR.94Aug31141706@birch.csl.sri.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 1994 14:04:51 GMT
Lines: 10

In article <RAR.94Aug31141706@birch.csl.sri.com> rar@birch.csl.sri.com (Bob Riemenschneider) writes:
>In article <CvEHFx.HEy@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu> hall@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu (Marty Hall) writes:
>
>> ... I've also heard vague rumors that someone
>> IS in fact picking [Lucid] up, but haven't heard more. Anyone know?
>
>No, but I'd be very surprised if someone doesn't.  While neither Franz nor
>Harlequin cares all that much about Lucid's "technology",

What is *that* supposed to mean?  That their technology sucks?
