Newsgroups: comp.ai
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!ncar!uchinews!gw2.att.com!nntpa!news
From: shaw@lotus.lc.att.com (Andrew M. Shaw)
Subject: Re: Help needed for English REsearch Paper
Message-ID: <DIEpKx.9yo@nntpa.cb.att.com>
Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration)
Nntp-Posting-Host: lotus.lc.att.com
Reply-To: shaw@lotus.lc.att.com
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
References: <48i9fn$1nh@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 18:48:33 GMT
Lines: 24

In article 1nh@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de, raa@platonita.uni-heidelberg.de (Richard Auer) writes:
> In article <1995Nov16.053813.3724@lafn.org>, an234@lafn.org (Andres Lessing) writes:
> |> 
> |> I am enrolledin a C++/Artificial Intelligence course in my High School. 
> |> For my english class we have been assigned a reasearch paper.  I decided 
> |> to do mine about how Artificial Intelligence will never be acheived.  I 
> |> however, need to find sources to back this.  I would appreciate any 
> |> help.  If you have any usefull documents, please E-mail me as I am not a 
> |> regualr at this usenet site
> 
> Could be you're looking in the wrong place. Try some philosophy newsgroup. At any
> rate, I think most people here _do_ believe it will be achieved, and has been
> achieved.
> Depends in part on what you understand as AI.

Also, it's a little unusual (or should be) to decide your thesis in
advance of doing any research at all.  If you only look for things
that support your preconception you run the risk of being later
confronted with overwhelming evidence in contradiction.

	andrew.shaw@att.com



