Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.robotics,comp.ai,sci.electronics
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!nic.scruz.net!earth.armory.com!rstevew
From: rstevew@armory.com (Richard Steven Walz)
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.robotics.research moderated, comp.robotics.misc
Organization: The Armory
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 1995 05:52:34 GMT
Message-ID: <D46Lnn.517@armory.com>
References: <3hmj9d$pba@rodan.UU.NET> <3hqms0$n7o@singapura.singnet.com.sg>
Sender: news@armory.com (Usenet News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: deepthought.armory.com
Lines: 17
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu news.groups:134815 comp.robotics:18151 comp.ai:27575 sci.electronics:120139

In article <3hqms0$n7o@singapura.singnet.com.sg>,
Jorge Codina <jorgelc@merlion.singnet.com.sg> wrote:
>Wesley Dane Scott (wscott@tam2000.tamu.edu) wrote:
>: Summary: RFD for new group, comp.robotics.research [moderated], with
>: worldwide distribution, intended for the discussion of
>: university, government, and industrial research in the field
>: of robotics.  Includes renaming comp.robotics to comp.robotics.misc.
>
>I am for the creation of comp.robotics.research [moderated] and against
>renaming comp.robotics.
-----------------------------------------
Agreed. It is an improper use of the subgroupings not to have a
comp.robotics as the general group for this branch of usenet groups.
If somebody wants to go off and be moderated, they don't also get to tell
US what to call ourselves!!
-Steve Walz   rstevew@armory.com

