Newsgroups: sci.physics.particle,sci.physics,alt.consciousness,comp.ai.philosophy
From: price@price.demon.co.uk (Michael Clive Price)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gatech!swrinde!pipex!demon!price.demon.co.uk!price
Subject: Re: Information Theory and QM
Distribution: world
References: <783590380snz@price.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0000
Message-ID: <784637778snz@price.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
Lines: 33
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu sci.physics.particle:1879 sci.physics:100034 comp.ai.philosophy:21967

<39ak03INN1crm@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <39dieg$o21@scunix2.harvard.edu>
<784157967snz@price.demon.co.uk> <39tumd$jan@server.st.usm.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 94 10:56:18 GMT
Reply-To: price@price.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29
Lines: 23

"Lawrence R. Mead" writes:
>:> I have read [Ron's] description of many-world theories, and to me
>:> it seems that it is equivalent to QM with the difference that
>:> what is called a collapse in QM is called a splitting of worlds in 
>:> many-worlds.
>:>
>:> Did I get something wrong ?
>
>: Only that the other worlds exist in MW but not in CI
>
>: Michael Price                        price@price.demon.co.uk
>
> I am getting tired of see your unsupported claims about the reality
> of alternate worlds. Would you please quit?

Shame the quote you picked does not show me asserting their existence,
but merely me commenting on how the many-worlds theory differs from the
copenhagen interpretation.

Think about it.

BTW, Larry, did you ever come back with your promised explanation of how
Pauli exclusion (an example of interference) is understood in terms of
particle interactions?  If so, I missed it.

Michael Price                        price@price.demon.co.uk
