From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!fuug!news.funet.fi!sunic2!sics.se!sics.se!torkel Sun May 31 19:04:32 EDT 1992
Article 5948 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!fuug!news.funet.fi!sunic2!sics.se!sics.se!torkel
>From: torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen)
Subject: Re: penrose
In-Reply-To: chris@kbsw1's message of Wed, 27 May 1992 15:22:04 GMT
Message-ID: <1992May27.182726.24523@sics.se>
Sender: news@sics.se
Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista
References: <atten.706786286@groucho.phil.ruu.nl> <31@tdatirv.UUCP>
	<1992May27.074252.7966@sics.se> <1992May27.152204.23631@kbsw1>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1992 18:27:26 GMT
Lines: 9

In article <1992May27.152204.23631@kbsw1> chris@kbsw1
 (Chris Kostanick 806 1044) writes:


   >Your conclusion that brains and minds are distinct seems less than
   >rigorous. Have you ever seen a disembodied mind?

  What? Less than rigorous? It seems perfectly rigorous to me! Who do you
know that died of insult to the mind?


