From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!psych.toronto.edu!christo Tue May 12 15:49:13 EDT 1992
Article 5431 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!psych.toronto.edu!christo
>From: christo@psych.toronto.edu (Christopher Green)
Subject: Re: Systems Reply I (repost perhaps)
Organization: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
References: <1992Apr11.053605.28116@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <6637@skye.ed.ac.uk> <1992May5.191454.25793@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <1992May6.170722.2619@psych.toronto.edu>
Keywords: AI Searle Dickhead Barf
Date: Wed, 6 May 1992 17:07:22 GMT

In article <1992May5.191454.25793@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> pindor@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Andrzej Pindor) writes:

>Argument "everyone knows that computers do not have thougths' is not acceptable.

Even if it is true.
(here we go again...)
-- 
Christopher D. Green                christo@psych.toronto.edu
Psychology Department               cgreen@lake.scar.utoronto.ca
University of Toronto
---------------------


