From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!europa.asd.contel.com!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff Tue May 12 15:48:54 EDT 1992
Article 5396 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!europa.asd.contel.com!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff
>From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Games (was Re: Categories: bounded or graded?)
Message-ID: <6649@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 4 May 92 14:23:17 GMT
References: <1992Apr27.173513.33215@spss.com> <1992Apr28.173231.11604@cs.ucf.edu> <1992Apr28.230052.7394@spss.com>
Sender: news@aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 12

In article <1992Apr28.230052.7394@spss.com> markrose@spss.com (Mark Rosenfelder) writes:
>Still, I love messing up definitions.

Well done.  This is a reason, by the way, why I don't play
the definition game where someone else demands definitions and
I have to supply them.  It's very difficult to come up with
definitions that can't be "messed up", but that doesn't mean
we never know what we're talking about.

Cf. my reply to Neil Rickert.

-- jd


