From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff Tue Mar 24 09:56:26 EST 1992
Article 4518 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff
>From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: The Systems Reply I
Message-ID: <6418@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 17 Mar 92 23:02:29 GMT
References: <1992Mar14.200214.28723@oracorp.com> <1992Mar16.230945.3769@psych.toronto.edu>
Sender: news@aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 8

In article <1992Mar16.230945.3769@psych.toronto.edu> michael@psych.toronto.edu (Michael Gemar) writes:
>In article <1992Mar14.200214.28723@oracorp.com> daryl@oracorp.com (Daryl McCullough) writes:

>>Searle claims that, in the Chinese Room, the man *is* the system,

Does he?  I thought he said the system has nothing the man doesn't
have, or something like that.  So if he does say the man is the sys,
I think he has in mind more a notion of contains than one of identity.


