From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!torn!utgpu!utcsri!rutgers!uwm.edu!linac!convex!mips.mitek.com!spssig.spss.com!markrose Tue Jun 23 13:20:59 EDT 1992
Article 6289 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!torn!utgpu!utcsri!rutgers!uwm.edu!linac!convex!mips.mitek.com!spssig.spss.com!markrose
>From: markrose@spss.com (Mark Rosenfelder)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Transducers
Message-ID: <1992Jun17.191602.5749@spss.com>
Date: 17 Jun 92 19:16:02 GMT
References: <1992Jun17.132117.9273@Princeton.EDU> <60837@aurs01.UUCP> <1992Jun17.182829.18441@mp.cs.niu.edu>
Organization: SPSS Inc.
Lines: 20
Nntp-Posting-Host: spssrs7.spss.com

In article <1992Jun17.182829.18441@mp.cs.niu.edu> rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu 
(Neil Rickert) writes:
>Once you have a signal suitable for applying to a transducer, you must
>face the fact that (if you will excuse the paraphrasing):
>
>	anything analog can do,
>	  digital can do better.
>	digital can do anything
>	  better than that.

You really can't abuse the meter like that.  How about

        It's been a hard day's night
        I been workin' analog.  
        It could be Harnad's right
        I should be workin' analog.

        But when I go digital
        I find the output the same
        And I am grounded all right


