From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!utcsri!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!arizona.edu!penny.telcom.arizona.edu!bill Tue Jul 28 09:41:42 EDT 1992
Article 6484 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!utcsri!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!arizona.edu!penny.telcom.arizona.edu!bill
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Defining other intelligence out of existence
Message-ID: <BILL.92Jul18211424@ca3.nsma.arizona.edu>
>From: bill@nsma.arizona.edu (Bill Skaggs)
Date: 18 Jul 92 21:14:24
References: <1992Jul15.013626.24984@dcs.qmw.ac.uk> <1992Jul18.210930.19647@wam.umd.edu>
Distribution: na,local
Organization: ARL Division of Neural Systems, Memory and Aging, University ofArizona
Nntp-Posting-Host: ca3.nsma.arizona.edu
In-reply-to: reh@next08pg2.wam.umd.edu's message of 18 Jul 92 21:09:30 GMT
Lines: 14

reh@next08pg2.wam.umd.edu (Richard Huddleston) writes:

   How about a much easier approach to this question, only slightly  
   tongue-in-cheek:

   Intelligence is the ability to be wrong, The more intelligent an organism  
   or species is, the more capable it is of being wrong, and the more likely  
   it is that the organism or species is doing something that it can be wrong  
   about.

Well, if that's what intelligence is, then my simulations are a lot
more intelligent than I ever realized.

	-- Bill


