From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!utcsri!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!uknet!qmw-dcs!abreu Tue Jul 28 09:41:40 EDT 1992
Article 6480 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!utcsri!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!uknet!qmw-dcs!abreu
>From: abreu@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Abreu)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Defining intelligence
Message-ID: <1992Jul17.190740.11841@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
Date: 17 Jul 92 19:07:40 GMT
References: <16JUL199217235568@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Sender: usenet@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Organization: Computer Science Dept, QMW, University of London
Lines: 9
Nntp-Posting-Host: it118.dcs.qmw.ac.uk

In <16JUL199217235568@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov> jones@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov (Jones) 
writes:

 > A recent poster (I have lost the pointer) says that the way to achieve
 > A.I. is to *define* "intelligence."  This is a classic mistake.  Marvin
 [...]

The claim is that to MEASURE intelligence you have to define first.
Hamilton


