From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!chalmers Tue Jan 21 09:26:23 EST 1992
Article 2800 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!chalmers
>From: chalmers@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (David Chalmers)
Subject: Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI?
Message-ID: <1992Jan16.213007.5245@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
Organization: Indiana University
References: <1992Jan16.054716.14332@oracorp.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 92 21:30:07 GMT
Lines: 12

Jeff Dalton writes:

> What I am saying in this thread is that Searle thinks the behavior is
> not possible without understanding.

I think you're projecting your own attitudes onto Searle.  Nothing
in Searle's writing suggests this.

-- 
Dave Chalmers                            (dave@cogsci.indiana.edu)      
Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition, Indiana University.
"It is not the least charm of a theory that it is refutable."


