From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!astro.as.utexas.edu!joe Thu Jan 16 17:19:46 EST 1992
Article 2651 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Xref: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca comp.ai.philosophy:2651 sci.philosophy.tech:1804 sci.logic:783
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!astro.as.utexas.edu!joe
>From: joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.logic
Subject: Re: 'understanding'
Message-ID: <64837@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 10 Jan 92 22:48:35 GMT
References: <1992Jan7.191853.17310@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <1992Jan7.162542.7202@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Jan08.005939.10233@spss.com> <1992Jan8.112343.7222@husc3.harvard.edu>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Followup-To: comp.ai.philosophy
Organization: UT Astronomy
Lines: 3

Can one understanding that which is false?

If so, then I think Penrose's argument collapses.


