From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wupost!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff Thu Jan  9 10:34:16 EST 1992
Article 2571 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wupost!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff
>From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Searle and the Chinese Room
Message-ID: <5914@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 8 Jan 92 21:42:44 GMT
References: <1991Dec8.192843.6951@psych.toronto.edu> <1991Dec11.170157.27053@cs.yale.edu> <1991Dec11.203452.9419@psych.toronto.edu> <1991Dec13.202505.27715@cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton)
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 8

In article <1991Dec13.202505.27715@cs.yale.edu> mcdermott-drew@CS.YALE.EDU (Drew McDermott) writes:
>It looks like I crystallized the disagreement out pretty well.  I was
>expecting more protests from the AI side, but I'm happy to see that so
>many of my colleagues understand the ineffable epiphenomenality of
>semantics. 

But don't thay have ot see it that way?  They don't have much hope
of seeing how to handle it otherwise.


