From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!libra.wistar.upenn.edu Mon Jan  6 10:30:36 EST 1992
Article 2502 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!libra.wistar.upenn.edu
>From: weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Edelman's non-computability non-argument
Message-ID: <61493@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 5 Jan 92 17:23:46 GMT
References: <61325@netnews.upenn.edu> <1992Jan4.152226.3327@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: libra.wistar.upenn.edu
In-reply-to: chisnall@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz (The Technicolour Throw-up)

In article <1992Jan4.152226.3327@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>, chisnall@cosc (The Technicolour Throw-up) writes:

>> I haven't the foggiest clue as to how to truly model the outside world.

>For starters you need to use transducer machines.  Surely this is obvious.
>Or have I missed some point?

Yes: "truly".
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu)


