From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!hsdndev!morrow.stanford.edu!CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU!Xenon.Stanford.EDU!vishal Wed Feb 26 12:54:18 EST 1992
Article 3991 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!hsdndev!morrow.stanford.edu!CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU!Xenon.Stanford.EDU!vishal
>From: vishal@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Vishal I. Sikka)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Robotic Follies
Message-ID: <1992Feb25.003248.10765@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 25 Feb 92 00:32:48 GMT
References: <1992Feb20.140749.9003@husc3.harvard.edu>
Sender: news@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Lines: 16

In article <1992Feb21.192207.9035@husc3.harvard.edu> zeleny@boucher.harvard.edu (Mikhail Zeleny) writes:
>.... Stuff Deleted
>

>left as an exercise for the reader.  (Hint: one point of difference is that
>Minsky's ass is long dead, but he still keeps asking the NSF for more money.)
>


Could you elaborate on what "Minsky's Ass" is, and why is it "long dead"?

Please be more specific in your critiques. Scientific arguments will
take the points that you make much farther than articles configured
around adjectives and metaphors.

Vishal Sikka.


