From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!libra.wistar.upenn.edu Wed Feb 26 12:53:49 EST 1992
Article 3946 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!libra.wistar.upenn.edu
>From: weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Wanted: Critique of Emperor's New Mind
Message-ID: <67158@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 23 Feb 92 17:05:48 GMT
References: <1992Feb21.174255.5978@oracorp.com>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: libra.wistar.upenn.edu
In-reply-to: daryl@oracorp.com

In article <1992Feb21.174255.5978@oracorp.com>, daryl@oracorp writes:
>>If you have an actual criticism, state it.

>The original poster asked for published critiques of The Emperor's New
>Mind, not for the opinions of Net people.

He also made what I believe is a bogus statement about Penrose.  Like
it or not, he's fair game.
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu)


