From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!zirdum Wed Feb 26 12:53:46 EST 1992
Article 3941 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!zirdum
>From: zirdum@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Antun Zirdum)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Aristotelian Ontology and AI
Message-ID: <1992Feb23.064940.14760@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Date: 23 Feb 92 06:49:40 GMT
References: <1992Feb21.143640.13134@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com> <1992Feb21.213124.3895@a.cs.okstate.edu> <1992Feb22.191412.4446@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com>
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Lines: 17

In article <1992Feb22.191412.4446@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com> petersow@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com (Wayne Peterson) writes:
>
>If we wait for science to tell us the answer to fundamental
>questions, we better live a long time and be very patient.  For
>science can never find the existential is and discern the is not.
>It is hopelessly lost in the shadows.
>
How very true! But I do not see another option, nor have you proposed one.
What you are talking about is, to some extent, great literature, but as an explanation
it is lacking.

>Wayne Peterson
>
>"What good is science, It does not even know what happens to you
>when you die."   Bob Prokup  Science Student

What happened to you before you were born?


