From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!garrot.DMI.USherb.CA!uxa.ecn.bgu.edu!mp.cs.niu.edu!linac!uchinews!spssig.spss.com!markrose Thu Feb 20 15:20:00 EST 1992
Article 3652 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!garrot.DMI.USherb.CA!uxa.ecn.bgu.edu!mp.cs.niu.edu!linac!uchinews!spssig.spss.com!markrose
>From: markrose@spss.com (Mark Rosenfelder)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Real-life Turing test
Message-ID: <1992Feb11.195902.150987@spss.com>
Date: 11 Feb 92 19:59:02 GMT
References: <1992Feb10.235221.56220@spss.com> <1992Feb11.102903.7771@sics.se>
Organization: SPSS Inc.
Lines: 6
Nntp-Posting-Host: spssrs7.spss.com

In article <1992Feb11.102903.7771@sics.se> torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen) writes:
>The test isn't a test unless it is conducted by somebody who knows what
>he's doing.

I tend to agree; but I think this shows that the Turing Test is 
too ill-specified.


