From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!mips!think.com!Think.COM!moravec Wed Aug 12 16:52:53 EDT 1992
Article 6604 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!mips!think.com!Think.COM!moravec
>From: moravec@Think.COM (Hans Moravec)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Turing Test Myths
Date: 12 Aug 1992 20:23:41 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
Lines: 11
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <16bs0dINNqhh@early-bird.think.com>
References: <2838@ucl-cs.uucp>
NNTP-Posting-Host: turing.think.com

In article <2838@ucl-cs.uucp>, G.Joly@cs.ucl.ac.uk (Gordon Joly) writes:
|> > Eliza never passed the Turing Test.  Never, never, never, never, never.

|> It did, with Feigenbaum's secreatry. She ask Feigenbaum to leave the room.

One might imagine a test to distinguish stories about conversations with 
Weizenbaum's secretary, and conversations with Feigenbaum's secretary.

Maybe something keyed on Bostonisms vs. Californiaspeak.




