From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!desire.wright.edu!wright!news Thu Apr 30 15:22:39 EDT 1992
Article 5252 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Xref: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca comp.ai.philosophy:5252 sci.logic:1216
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!desire.wright.edu!wright!news
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,sci.logic
Subject: Re: An apology to Mr. Krishnaprasad 
Message-ID: <1992Apr24.174440.11202@cs.wright.edu>
>From: tkprasad@valhalla.wright.edu (Thirunarayan Krishnaprasad)
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1992 17:44:40 GMT
Reply-To: tkprasad@valhalla.wright.edu
Sender: news@cs.wright.edu (USENET News System)
References: <1992Apr23.164131.15250@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Organization: Wright State University
Lines: 18

In light of Philip Wong's message, I thought it is appropriate
to repost my previous message under the new subject:

My EMAIL to Philip Wong was NOT meant to be a POSTING.
I wanted to convey to him, that for a beginner, the books
GODEL, ESCHER, BACH and GODEL'S PROOF are a good starting 
point as they do a good job of explaining the basic ideas. 
I do realize that after an informal understanding of the
underlying ideas, one needs the kind of  rigorous proofs 
given in the textbooks on FOL. My statements have been 
interpreted out of context. In fact, I owe  a lot to 
Enderton's book for whatever I know in logic. I do not 
think I deserve the slanderous remarks from Michael Zeleny,
for I did not mean to be disrespectful to anyone. My EMAIL
has been blown out of proportion.

Prasad



