From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!src.honeywell.com!saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com!petersow Mon Jan  6 10:30:07 EST 1992
Article 2449 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!src.honeywell.com!saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com!petersow
>From: petersow@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com (Wayne Peterson)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Ignore Searle and be happier
Message-ID: <1991Dec30.205355.12606@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com>
Date: 30 Dec 91 20:53:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: saifr00.1991Dec30.205355.12606
References: <1991Dec30.193339.28438@mp.cs.niu.edu> <1991Dec30.194943.25819@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <1991Dec30.203517.30168@mp.cs.niu.edu>
Organization: Honeywell Air Transport Systems Division
Lines: 1

You say that consciousness is vague because it can not be measured.  Let me ask you what could you measure without consciousness?   It seems without consciousness I know nothing.  Knowledge then is dependant on consciousness.  That includes knowledge abou
t the brain.  Do I have knowledge about your consciousness?  No, for all I know, a computer wrote your article.


