Newsgroups: comp.ai.neural-nets,comp.ai.philosophy
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!netcom.com!jqb
From: jqb@netcom.com (Jim Balter)
Subject: Re: Is the "Strong AI" position intellectually defensible ?
Message-ID: <jqbE0Ktnt.Hpp@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <328304E4.7234@dbo.mts.dec.com> <jqbE0KnyM.7LA@netcom.com> <560hpe$37o@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1996 00:07:05 GMT
Lines: 13
Sender: jqb@netcom23.netcom.com
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.ai.neural-nets:34452 comp.ai.philosophy:48512

In article <560hpe$37o@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
Anders N Weinstein <andersw+@pitt.edu> wrote:
>Selwyn Akintola  <akintola.selwyn@dbo.mts.dec.com> wrote:
>>Is the "Strong AI" position intellectually defensible ?
>
>No. 

Here we have evidence of Weinstein's intellectual standards.


-- 
<J Q B>

