Newsgroups: comp.ai.neural-nets
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!newsgate.duke.edu!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.interpath.net!sas!newshost.unx.sas.com!saswss
From: saswss@hotellng.unx.sas.com (Warren Sarle)
Subject: Re: Input Variable Contribution
Originator: saswss@hotellng.unx.sas.com
Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
Message-ID: <DuAvq9.1Lv@unx.sas.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 23:54:09 GMT
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: hotellng.unx.sas.com
References: <31C1A2EE.274E@wvu.edu> <31C3B219.4DE0@cs.ucdavis.edu> <31C6F5B7.135C@mail.ddnet.es> <4qiojn$3q@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com> <biocomp.22.02BE9E80@biocomp.seanet.com> <48116845wnr@ecowar.demon.co.uk> <biocomp.159.000DBA8E@biocomp.seanet.com> <89095849wnr@ecowar.demon.co.uk>
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
Lines: 13


In article <89095849wnr@ecowar.demon.co.uk>, "C:INTERNETSPOOLMAIL" <drago@ecowar.demon.co.uk> writes:
|> ...
|> Does it mean that there is no agreement on the best practice
|> for *multivariate*, *nonlinear* variable (sub)selection?

There's not a whole lot of agreement even in the *linear* case.

-- 

Warren S. Sarle       SAS Institute Inc.   The opinions expressed here
saswss@unx.sas.com    SAS Campus Drive     are mine and not necessarily
(919) 677-8000        Cary, NC 27513, USA  those of SAS Institute.
