Newsgroups: comp.ai.neural-nets
From: jimmy@ecowar.demon.co.uk (Jimmy Shadbolt)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!pipex!peernews.demon.co.uk!ecowar.demon.co.uk!jimmy
Subject: Re: Comparison between statistical methods 
Distribution: world
References: <petersg.61.0@pandora.bre.orst.edu>
Organization: Econostat
Reply-To: jimmy@ecowar.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.21)
Lines: 18
X-Posting-Host: ecowar.demon.co.uk
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 14:33:51 +0000
Message-ID: <793982031snz@ecowar.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

In article <petersg.61.0@pandora.bre.orst.edu> petersg@pandora.bre.orst.edu writes:

>Does anyone have any references or know anything about when you would use 
>one statistical method over another.  For example, neural nets, induction, 
>regression, etc.  I have one reference for Michie, et al., 1994 from a 
>STATLOG project but I don't know the exact title or where to find it.
>
        "Machine learning, neural and statistical classification"
        eds. Michie, D. et al, Ellis Horwood ISBN 0-13-106360-X

        Forthcoming meeting on statistics and neural networks in
        Edinburgh (April 21st) may also produce some interesting
        findings ...

        Cheers

        Drago

