Newsgroups: comp.ai.fuzzy
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!mercury.hsi.com!news
From: marksc@wpmail.code3.com (Mark A. Scarton)
Subject: Re: Fuzzy in real-time systems
Message-ID: <31600635.866557183@mercury.hsi.com>
Sender: news@hsi.com (USENET news)
Nntp-Posting-Host: pc027064.code3.com
Reply-To: marksc@wpmail.code3.com
Organization: 3M Health Information Systems
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182
References: <19960328.120751.170056.NETNEWS@WVNVM.WVNET.EDU>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 16:39:20 GMT
Lines: 15

mbrown@olie.wvitcoe.wvnet.edu (Myron Brown) wrote:
>  Hi.  I've heard that most people are not interested in using Fuzzy (or
>other AI techniques) for controlling real-time systems that are
>mission-or life-critical.  Is this "entirely" true?  If so, are there
>related tasks in which these techniques would be more readily accepted?

Oh, I don't know.  I used it in the development of a passive sensor (radar)
system that tracks ballistic missiles for threat detection and analysis.  I'm
also using it in clinical systems for hospitals.  Are those mission or life
critical enough?  ;-)

Mark A. Scarton, ABD
CompUtah!, Park City, Utah USA
Home: 801.565.9835
Office: 801.265-4612
