Newsgroups: comp.ai.alife,comp.ai.philosophy,comp.ai,alt.consciousness
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornell!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!news.alpha.net!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!vlsi_lib
From: vlsi_lib@netcom.com (Gerard Malecki)
Subject: Re: Thought Question
Message-ID: <vlsi_libD45qrE.zx@netcom.com>
Reply-To: shankar@vlibs.com
Organization: VLSI Libraries Incorporated
References: <3gvigc$g3h@nntp <3hq1v2$712@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> <3hu5km$t61@cato.Direct.CA>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 1995 18:45:13 GMT
Lines: 10
Sender: vlsi_lib@netcom9.netcom.com
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.ai.alife:2480 comp.ai.philosophy:25633 comp.ai:27567

In article <3hu5km$t61@cato.Direct.CA> aturner@Direct.CA (Allan Turner) writes:
>	But the real question is whether consciousness could be modeled by
>something that was not conscious.

Since humans who are presumably conscious have failed so far to come up
with a model for consciousness, it could well turn out that modelling 
consciousness could be an unconscious affair after all.

Shankar Ramakrishnan
shankar@vlibs.com
