From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!torn.onet.on.ca!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic2!seunet!kullmar!pkmab!ske Tue Jun 23 13:20:49 EDT 1992
Article 6271 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!torn.onet.on.ca!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic2!seunet!kullmar!pkmab!ske
>From: ske@pkmab.se (Kristoffer Eriksson)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Quantum consciousness
Message-ID: <6982@pkmab.se>
Date: 15 Jun 92 22:14:46 GMT
References: <1992Jun10.173555.27484@cs.ucf.edu> <1992Jun10.190115.6937@guinness.idbsu.edu> <1992Jun10.210233.7608@guinness.idbsu.edu>
Organization: Peridot Konsult i Mellansverige AB, Oerebro, Sweden
Lines: 16

In article <1992Jun10.210233.7608@guinness.idbsu.edu> holmes@opal.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes) writes:
> But all these branches are still
>embedded in the common world state; there is not the exponential
>expansion of needed "resources" which appears to arise if we think of

It seems to me, that your view of the many-worlds interpretation is
fairly close to an interpretation where there is just one world, and
where the wave functions never actualy collaps - they just appear that
way on measurements. Which is an interpretation that I wouldn't find
unbelievable (but I'm certainly no expert), but perhaps would not
call "the many-worlds interpretation".

-- 
Kristoffer Eriksson, Peridot Konsult AB, Hagagatan 6, S-703 40 Oerebro, Sweden
Phone: +46 19-13 03 60  !  e-mail: ske@pkmab.se
Fax:   +46 19-11 51 03  !  or ...!{uunet,mcsun}!mail.swip.net!kullmar!pkmab!ske


