Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.ai.genetic,comp.ai.neural-nets,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.lang.asm.x86,comp.unix.programmer,comp.ai.philosophy
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!newspump.sol.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!netcom.com!vrotney
From: vrotney@netcom.com (William Paul Vrotney)
Subject: Re: Lisp is not an interpreted language
In-Reply-To: Mukesh Prasad's message of Tue, 12 Nov 1996 08:53:15 -0500
Message-ID: <vrotneyE0svpw.B41@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <327D00D8.4B9F@earthlink.net> <55qi3l$j5p@dawn.mmm.com> <3280FE73.1259@dma.isg.mot.com> <55t27r$dk9@godzilla.cs.nwu.edu> <jqbE0Iu9B.Awv@netcom.com> <32834C76.6247@dma.isg.mot.com> <3056573815529238@naggum.no> <328738DF.7D9E@dma.isg.mot.com> <3056786391534295@naggum.no> <3288814B.6CF6@dma.isg.mot.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 08:32:20 GMT
Lines: 19
Sender: vrotney@netcom8.netcom.com
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.ai:42124 comp.ai.genetic:10342 comp.ai.neural-nets:34533 comp.lang.lisp:23673 comp.lang.c++:226128 comp.os.msdos.programmer:81694 comp.lang.asm.x86:32341 comp.unix.programmer:52514 comp.ai.philosophy:48691

In article <3288814B.6CF6@dma.isg.mot.com> Mukesh Prasad
<mprasad@dma.isg.mot.com> writes:

> Not too many people, Erik.  The Emacs stuff that you _do_ know
> about, is more an exception, not a rule.  Out here, C and C++ rule,
> and Java seems to be on the rise.  Lisp is not really
> in the picture anymore.  A pity, but it made too many promises
                             ^
                             |
                        Sure, you think it is a pity.  What hypocrisy!

Yes you are right Emacs, Lisp and AI are the exception.  So why are *you*
posting your predictable opinions to such exceptional news groups?  Is it
because you want to advance Emacs, Lisp or AI? ... I don't think so ...


-- 

William P. Vrotney - vrotney@netcom.com
