Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!bnrgate!bcars267!pavalin
From: pavalin@bnr.ca (Paul Valin)
Subject: Re: Montreal versue Quebec
Message-ID: <pavalin-230493104535@47.80.14.222>
Followup-To: rec.sport.hockey
Sender: news@bnr.ca (usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: bcarm4b8
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
References: <1r8p64$kj6@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1993 14:49:44 GMT
Lines: 25

#reply#In article <1r8p64$kj6@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>, vergolin@euler.lbs.msu.edu
#reply#(David Vergolini) wrote:
#reply#> 
#reply#>Did anyone see the Montreal - Quebec game yesterday?  It was tight right down
#reply#>to the last second of the third period.  In the overtime Roy and Hextall played
#reply#>like they were gods.
#reply#>Ok, so Montreal won!  They deserved it after getting their first goal in
#reply#>overtime waved off because the puck was hit in with a high stick.  Their second
#reply#>goal in overtime was also replayed, but I could not tell if it was the Montreal
#reply#>player who kicked it in.  The puck definitely was not directed in by a stick.
#reply#>Anyways, Montreal is back into the series.
#reply#> 

The overhead replay pretty clearly showed that it was the Quebec 
defender who deflected the puck.  The re-play officials did not 
take nearly as much time to make this call as they did for the first 
non-goal, so it seemed pretty non-controversial.

I agree that it was a great game; good to see Roy and Damphousse back
into form.  Hopefully the sign of good things to come...
#sig# --------------------------------------------------------------------
#sig# Paul Valin                                     Tel: + 1 613 763 7394
#sig# Bell-Northern Research Ltd.                    Email: pavalin@bnr.ca
#sig# P.O. Box 3511, Station C
#sig# Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4H7               'only my opinions...'
